Naidu v. The Bancorp. Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/06/24 EXTENDING, up to and including 03/05/24, the time for Defendants' The Bancorp Bank, N.A., and Chime Financial, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to 1 Complaint. (Licea Chavez, V)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 NAVIKESH NAIDU,
11

Plaintiff,

12

Case No. 2:23-cv-02574-KJN

vs.

13

14 THE BANCORP BANK, N.A.;

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT

15 CHIME FINANCIAL, INC. F/K/A

1DEBIT, INC.; and MOONPAY USA

16 LLC,
17

Defendants.

18
19
20

ORDER

21
22
23
24

Pursuant to the Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s
Complaint (“Stipulation”), IT IS SO ORDERED:
(1) The Stipulation is GRANTED;

25
26
27
28

////
////
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

(2) Defendants The Bancorp Bank, N.A., and Chime Financial, Inc. shall have
up to and including March 5, 2024, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff

4 Navikesh Naidu’s Complaint.
5 Dated: February 6, 2024
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER