Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Filing 21

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/25/2024 DECLINING to Relate Cases 2:23-cv-2585 TLN DB and 2:23-cv-3016 MCE AC. (Woodson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SAMANTHA WILLIAMS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

No. 2:23-cv-02585-TLN-DB

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

15

Defendant.

16
17

CHRISTINA YANEZ-DAVISON,

18
19
20
21

No. 2:23-cv-03016-MCE-AC

Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., et al.
Defendants.

22
23
24

The undersigned judge declines to relate the above-captioned cases pursuant to Local Rule

25

123(a). Assignment of the matters to the same judge is not likely to effect a substantial savings of

26

judicial effort or other economies. These actions involve the same or similar defendants, but the

27

actions involve events specific to each party, the questions of fact are different, the questions of

28

1

1

law are not novel, it is not clear that the same result should follow in these actions, and

2

assignment to different judges would not entail substantial duplication of labor.

3
4

Therefore, 2:23-cv-03016-MCE-AC shall not be reassigned to the undersigned judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

DATED: March 25, 2024

7
8
9
10

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2