(PC) Van Huisen v. Chief of Staff et al
Filing
24
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 6/4/2024 RECOMMENDING the 5 , 7 , 11 , 21 Motions be denied as moot. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Kyono, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUSIEN,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
CHIEF OF STAFF,
Case No. 2:23-cv-02815-DAD-JDP (PC)
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
PLAINTIFF’S OUTSTANDING MOTIONS
BE DENIED AS MOOT AND THAT THE
CLERK OF COURT BE DIRECTED TO
CLOSE THIS MATTER
Defendant.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
16
17
18
Plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Van
19
Huisen v. DeSantis, No. 2:23-cv-01758-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a
20
claim); Van Huisen v. Clinton Administration, No. 2:23-cv-01596-DJC-KJN (E.D. Cal.)
21
(dismissed for failure to state a claim); Van Husisen v. Joseph R. Biden, No. 2:23-cv-00944-DJC-
22
EFB (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim). Accordingly, on March 5, 2024, I
23
recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. ECF No. 14.
24
Plaintiff was allowed fourteen days to file objections. Id. at 3. I also recommended that plaintiff
25
be directed to tender the filing fee within thirty days of any order adopting these
26
recommendations. Id.
27
28
Plaintiff filed objections but did not tender the filing fee. ECF No. 15. On April 3, 2024,
the district judge adopted the findings and recommendations and ordered plaintiff to tender the
1
1
filing fee within thirty days. ECF No. 20. The district judge referred the matter back to me for
2
further pre-trial proceedings. Id.
3
4
The deadline imposed by the court to tender the filing fee has expired, and plaintiff has
neither tendered the filing fee nor otherwise responded to the court’s orders.
5
Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that:
6
1. Plaintiff’s outstanding motions, ECF Nos. 5, 7, 11, & 21, be denied as moot; and
7
2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this matter.
8
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
9
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
10
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
11
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
12
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
13
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
14
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
15
appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez
16
v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
Dated:
June 4, 2024
20
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?