(SS) Senstad v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 05/07/24 DIRECTING any party who has not already notified the Court regarding their position with regard to consent, do so within 30 days of the date of this order or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. (Licea Chavez, V)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AMY L. SENSTAD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:23-CV-2930-DMC

v.

ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial

18
19

review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
A review of the docket reflects that all parties have not notified the Court

20
21

regarding consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order

22

and Eastern District of California Local Rules, Appendix A, the time to do so has now expired.

23

Any party who has not already notified the Court regarding their position with regard to consent,

24

shall do so within 30 days of the date of this order or show cause why sanctions should not be

25

imposed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on all parties a copy of the Court’s form

26

entitled “Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment.”

27

///

28

///
1

1

The filing of a consent election form within the time provided herein shall

2

constitute an adequate response to this order to show cause, which will be discharged upon such

3

filing.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: May 7, 2024

____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2