(SS) Madison v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/08/24 GRANTING 14 & 16 Motion for Attorney Fees and AWARDING $7,750.00 in fees and no costs. (Licea Chavez, V)
1 Francesco Benavides, CSBN 258924
Law Offices of Francesco Benavides
2
1990 N. California Blvd. Suite 20
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
3
Tel: (925) 222-7071
4
Fax: (925) 522-5306
Email: francesco@benavidesdisabilitylaw.com
5
6 Attorney for Plaintiff
7 NASHIRA ESHE MADISON
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12 NASHIRA ESHE MADISON,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16 MARTIN J. O’MALLEY,
17 Commissioner of Social Security,
18
No. 2:23-cv-2968 DB
STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND
PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND
EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT;
AND ORDER
Defendant.
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their
20 undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded
21 attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $7,750.00, under the Equal Access to
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This
amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by
counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d),
1920.
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will
consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to
1 Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability
2 to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset
3 allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After
4 the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are
5 subject to any offset.
6
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
7 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause
8 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Plaintiff’s counsel,
9 Francesco Benavides, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff.
10
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for
11 EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
12 Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall
13 constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or
14 Francesco Benavides, including the Law Offices of Francesco Benavides, may have
15 relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
16
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Francesco Benavides to seek
17 Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings
18 clause provisions of the EAJA.
19
20
Respectfully submitted,
21
22
23
24
25
Dated: May 6, 2024
Law Offices of Francesco Benavides
By:
/s/ Francesco Benavides
FRANCESCO P. BENAVIDES
Attorney for Plaintiff
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
Dated: May 6, 2024
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
MATHEW W. PILE
Associate General Counsel
Social Security Administration
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
By:
Oscar Gonzalez de Llano*
OSCAR GONZALEZ de Llano
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
(*Permission to use electronic signature
obtained via email on May 6, 2024).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
ORDER
1
2
3
4
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access
to Justice Act Fees and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the
5 amount of $7,750.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs under 28 U.S.C.
6 § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.
7
8 DATED: May 8, 2024
9
/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?