(HC) Clarke v. Unknown

Filing 5

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/07/2024 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Ne wman for all further proceedings. It is further RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations.New Case Number: 2:23-cv-3004 TLN KJN (HC).(Lopez, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEE KELLY CLARKE, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:23-cv3004 KJN P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNKNOWN, 15 Respondent. 16 By order filed January 3, 2024, petitioner’s habeas application was dismissed, and thirty 17 18 days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty-day period has expired, and 19 petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. 20 Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the order was returned, 21 petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of 22 his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record 23 address of the party is fully effective. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 24 25 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 26 27 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 28 //// 1 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 4 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 5 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 6 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 7 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 Dated: February 7, 2024 9 10 11 12 /clar3004.fta.hab 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?