Decker v. County of Sacramento, et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 2/2/2024 DIRECTING defendants to respond to the 1 First Amended Complaint by 3/7/2024. (Woodson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION William E. Camy, SBN 291397 Alison J. Southard, SBN 335716 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 500 Sacramento, CA 95815 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 wcamy@porterscott.com asouthard@porterscott.com Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA Exempt from filing fee pursuant to Government Code section 6103 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BRIAN R. DECKER, an Individual, CASE NO.: 2:24-cv-00021-DJC-AC Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT R. JONES, SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, ROBERT DUGGAN, CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, BRANDON M. LUKE, GEORGE PARSONS, AND JEFF COUCH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a Municipal Corporation; SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SCOTT R. JONES, in his official capacity as Sacramento County Sheriff; SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, a Municipal Utility District; ROBERT DUGGAN, in his official capacity as an employee of SMUD; CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, a Municipal Corporation; CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRANDON M. LUKE in his official capacity as Chief of Police, for the Rancho Cordova Police Department; GEORGE PARSONS, in his official capacity as a Sacramento County Sheriff's Deputy and/or a Rancho Cordova Police Officer; JEFF COUCH, in his official capacity as a Sacramento County Sheriff's Deputy and/or a Rancho Cordova Police Sergeant; and DOES 1 TO 50, inclusive. Defendants. Complaint filed: 11/04/2021 / 26 27 28 4876-6093-1146, v. 1 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT R. JONES, SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, ROBERT DUGGAN, CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, BRANDON M. LUKE, GEORGE PARSONS, AND JEFF COUCH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff BRIAN R. DECKER (“Plaintiff’), Defendants CITY OF RANCHO 2 CORDOVA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT R. JONES, SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 3 UTILITY DISTRICT, ROBERT DUGGAN, CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, BRANDON M. LUKE, 4 GEORGE PARSONS, AND JEFF COUCH (“Defendants”) (Plaintiff and Defendants will be collectively 5 referred to as “Parties”) have been meeting and conferring regarding Defendants’ responsive pleading in 6 this matter, including a potential Motion to Dismiss. 7 WHEREAS, Counsel for Defendants CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, BRANDON M. LUKE, 8 GEORGE PARSONS, AND JEFF COUCH (collectively, “City Defendants”) provided Plaintiff’s counsel 9 with authority supporting its anticipated Motion to Dismiss. 10 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel indicated he would review the authorities described above and possibly amend the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) after reviewing the authorities. 12 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel is currently ill and likely would not be able to amend the FAC prior to the current responsive pleading deadline, February 8, 2024. 14 15 WHEREAS, any responsive pleading filed by any of the Defendants in this matter may be rendered moot if Plaintiff amends his FAC. 16 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, by and through their 17 respective undersigned counsel, that the time for Defendants herein to respond to the FAC shall be 18 extended up to and including March 7, 2024. 19 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 21 22 Dated: 2/2/2024 GORMAN LAW OFFICE 23 24 By _/s/ A. Alexander Gorman A. Alexander Gorman Attorney for Plaintiff BRIAN R. DECKER 25 26 27 28 /// /// 4876-6093-1146, v. 1 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT R. JONES, SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, ROBERT DUGGAN, CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, BRANDON M. LUKE, GEORGE PARSONS, AND JEFF COUCH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Dated: 2/2/2024 2 3 PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION By: 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: 2/2/2024 /s/ Alison J. Southard William E. Camy Alison J. Southard Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA RIVERA HEWITT PAUL LLP 10 11 By: 12 13 14 15 Dated: 2/2/2024 /s/ Jonathan B. Paul Jonathan B. Paul Attorney for Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 16 17 18 19 20 21 By: /s/ Jeffrey Schultz Jeffrey Schultz John Poulos Attorneys for Defendant SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT and ROBERT DUGGAN 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4876-6093-1146, v. 1 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT R. JONES, SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, ROBERT DUGGAN, CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, BRANDON M. LUKE, GEORGE PARSONS, AND JEFF COUCH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Having reviewed the STIPULATION among the Parties and finding good cause therefore, it is hereby ordered that: The deadline for Defendants CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT R. JONES, SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, ROBERT DUGGAN, CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, BRANDON M. LUKE, GEORGE PARSONS, AND JEFF COUCH shall be extended up to and including March 7, 2024. 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 2, 2024 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4876-6093-1146, v. 1 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT R. JONES, SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, ROBERT DUGGAN, CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, BRANDON M. LUKE, GEORGE PARSONS, AND JEFF COUCH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?