Radif v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Senior District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/24/2025 GRANTING 30 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Marquee Law Group, A.P.C. and each of its attorneys are hereby removed as the attorneys of record for Plaintiff Aram Radif. IT IS FUR THER ORDERED that this case is STAYED for 30 days to allow Plaintiff an opportunity to retain new counsel. If Plaintiff is unable to retain new counsel, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge Alison Claire, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) for all further proceedings. (Deputy Clerk KEZ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARAM RADIF, an individual, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 No. 2:24-cv-00129 JAM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; WALMART, INC., a Delaware Corporation; UNI CEREZO, an individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. Pending before the Court is the Motion of Marquee Law Group, 20 A.P.C., for an order permitting their withdrawal as counsel for 21 Plaintiff Aram Radif, ECF No. 30. 22 moving papers and having taken all relevant matters into 23 consideration, rules as follows: 24 The Court, having reviewed the GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, said Motion is granted. 25 Marquee Law Group, A.P.C. and each of its attorneys are hereby 26 removed as the attorneys of record for Plaintiff Aram Radif as of 27 the date of this Order. 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is stayed for thirty 1 1 (30) days to allow Plaintiff an opportunity to retain new 2 counsel. 3 matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge Alison Claire, 4 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) for all further proceedings. If Plaintiff is unable to retain new counsel, the 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: January 24, 2025 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?