(HC) Sedlar v. Sacramento County Jail et al
Filing
5
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 07/29/2024 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes for all further proceedings. It is further RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for Petitioner's failure to comply with Court Orders. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. New Case Number:2:24-cv-0132-TLN-DB (HC). (Lopez, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT WAYNE SEDLAR,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:24-cv-0132 DB P
v.
ORDER AND FNDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
SACRAMENTO CO. JAIL, et al.,
15
Respondents.
16
Petitioner is a county inmate prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of
17
18
habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In an order filed May 25, 2024, this court ordered
19
petitioner to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty days if
20
he wishes to proceed with this action. Thirty days have passed and petitioner has not filed a
21
motion to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s
22
May 25 order. Petitioner was warned in the May 25 order that his failure to comply with the
23
order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to randomly assign a district
24
25
judge to this case; and
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for petitioner’s
26
27
failure to comply with court orders. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; E.D. Cal. R. 110.
28
////
1
1
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
2
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
3
after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written
4
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's
5
Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the
6
specified time may result in waiver of the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v.
7
Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). In the objections, petitioner may address whether a
8
certificate of appealability should issue in the event an appeal of the judgment in this case is filed.
9
See Rule 11, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases (the district court must issue or deny a certificate of
10
appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant).
11
Dated: July 29, 2024
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
DLB:9
DB Prisoner Inbox/Habeas/R/sedl0132.hc.fta fr
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?