(PS) Shaheed v. USCIS Sacramento Field Office

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/24/2025 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING this action, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court's order. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk KEZ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NOMAN SHAHEED, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:24-cv-00329-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER USCIS Sacramento Field Office, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Noman Shaheed (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. 18 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On December 20, 2024 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 21 and recommendations were to be filed within 14 days. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 20, 2024 (ECF No. 8), are 27 28 ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to 1 1 comply with the Court’s order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Date: January 24, 2025 4 5 6 7 8 ___________________________________ TROY L. NUNLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?