(PC) Jones v. Dept. of Corrections et al

Filing 14

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 5/8/2024 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EDWARD LEE JONES, JR.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:24-cv-0386 KJM CSK P

v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et
al.,
Defendants.

16
17

By order filed March 24, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days leave

18
19

to file an amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 11.) Thirty days from that date have now

20

passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s

21

order.

22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

28

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
1

1

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

2

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3
4

Dated: May 8, 2024

5
6
7
8

/1/jone0386.fta

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2