(PC) Iseli v. Lynch et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/24/2024 ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING 1 Complaint. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDEN WILLIE ISELI, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:24-cv-00800-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Branden Willie Iseli (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 28, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 27 28 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 10), filed August 28, 2024, are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. The Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this action. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Date: September 24, 2024 8 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?