Stansberry v. City of Vacaville

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/13/2024 ORDERING the parties shall meet, in person or by telephone, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 within 30 days from the date of this order. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report and request for hearing before the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of entry of a Pretrial Scheduling Order within 7 days after the parties' Rule 26 discussion. (Nair, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TARA STANSBERRY,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:24-cv-00817 CKD

Plaintiff,
ORDER

v.
CITY OF VACAVILLE,
Defendant.

16
17

Defendant has answered the complaint. (ECF No. 6.) Within 30 days from the date of this

18

order, if they have not already done so, the parties shall meet, in person or by telephone, as

19

required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. Within 7 days after the parties’ Rule 26

20

discussion, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report and any optional request for hearing before

21

the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of entry of a pretrial scheduling order. The joint status report

22

shall address the relevant portions of Local Rule 240(a).

23

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

24

1. Within 30 days from the date of this order, the parties shall meet, in person or by

25

telephone, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.

26

2. Within 7 days after the parties’ Rule 26 discussion, the parties shall file a joint status

27

report and request for hearing before the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of entry of a pretrial

28

scheduling order. The report shall address the following matters:
1

1

a. Service of process;

2

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

3

c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

4

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

5

e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling;

6

f. The report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 outlining the

7

proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses;

8
9

g. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut−off dates for discovery
and law and motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;

10

h. Special procedures, if any;

11

i. Estimated trial time;

12

j. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the

13

simplicity or complexity of the proceedings;

14

k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy;

15

l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled;

16

m. The parties’ positions with respect to Voluntary Dispute Resolution (VDRP)

17

under Local Rule 271(d); and

18

n. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this

19

matter.

20

Dated: May 13, 2024
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22
23
24

8
stan24cv0817.isc

25
26
27
28
2