King v. Hard Rock Cafe Int'l (USA), Inc.

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/07/24 SETTING Plaintiff's Opposition to #10 Motion to Dismiss due on or before 05/29/24 and Defendant's reply due on or before 06/12/24. (Licea Chavez, V)

1
2
3
4
5
6

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
Brittany S. Scott (State Bar No. 327132)
1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff

8

Additional Counsel on signature page

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10
11
12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTINA KING, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,

13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

15
16
17

HARD ROCK CAFE INTERNATIONAL
(USA), INC.,
Defendant.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 2:24-CV-01119-KJM-CKD

Case No. 2:24-cv-01119-KJM-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION
TO DISMISS

STIPULATION

1
2

Plaintiff Christina King (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Hard Rock Café International (USA).

3

Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) by and through their respective counsel, hereby

4

stipulate to the below briefing schedule for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10). The

5

Parties agree and stipulate as follows:

6
7
8
9
10
11

WHEREAS, on March 4, 2024, Plaintiff commenced a putative class action against
Defendant in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, Case No. 24CV004071.
WHEREAS, on April 12, 2024, Defendant removed the case to the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of California (ECF No. 1);
WHEREAS, on April 29, 2024, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Class
Action Complaint (ECF No. 10)(the “Motion”);

12

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion is due on May 13, 2024;

13

WHEREAS, Defendant’s reply in support of its Motion is due on May 23, 2024;

14

WHEREAS, the hearing on the Motion is set for July 12, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.;

15

WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred and agreed to the following briefing schedule:

16

1.

2024; and

17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion shall be due on, or before, May 29,

2.

Defendant’s reply in support of the Motion shall be due on, or before, June
12, 2024;

WHEREAS, the briefing schedule shall not alter the date for the hearing on Defendant’s
MTD or otherwise effect any dates set by this Court;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties that:

23

1. Plaintiff’s opposition to the MTD shall be due on, or before, May 29, 2024; and

24

2. Defendant’s reply in support of its MTD shall be due on, or before, June 12,

25

2024.

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 2:24-CV-01119-KJM-CKD

1

1

Dated: May 7, 2024

2

Respectfully submitted,
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

3
By:

4
5

L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
Brittany S. Scott (State Bar No. 327132)
1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiff

11
12

/s/ Brittany S. Scott
Brittany S. Scott

Dated: May 7, 2024

13

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
By: /s/ Scott W. Pink (as authorized 4/30/2024)
Scott W. Pink
2765 Sand Hill Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendant

18
19

ORDER

20
21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

22

1.

Plaintiff’s opposition to the MTD IS due on, or before, May 29, 2024; and

23

2.

Defendant’s reply in support of its MTD IS due on, or before, June 12, 2024.

24

DATED: May 7, 2024.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 2:24-CV-01119-KJM-CKD

2