Williams v. UPS, Inc., et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Senior District Judge William B. Shubb on 1/3/2025: In light of plaintiff's attorney's untimely pleading 17 , filed yesterday afternoon, the hearing previously set for 1/6/2025 is VACATED, and counsel's motion to withdraw 15 is DENIED without prejudice to its being refiled and noticed for hearing on a date that does not conflict with counsel's personal or cultural obligations. (See document for further details.) (Deputy Clerk KKS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ----oo0oo---- 8 9 TRINA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 12 No. 2:24-cv-01203 WBS SCR ORDER UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; ANDREW KERN, 13 Defendants. 14 15 ----oo0oo---- 16 17 18 19 20 21 In light of plaintiff's attorney’s untimely pleading (Docket No. 17), filed yesterday afternoon, the hearing previously set for January 6, 2025 is VACATED, and counsel’s motion to withdraw (Docket No. 15) is DENIED without prejudice to its being refiled and noticed for hearing on a date that does not conflict with counsel’s personal or cultural obligations. 22 23 24 25 26 27 Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw was originally filed on November 20, 2024, without noticing a date for hearing. No. 13). The court subsequently set it for hearing on January 6, 2025, as the next available law and motion date. 14). (Docket (Docket No. Counsel did not complain about this date, and the court was unaware it was Armenian Christmas or that it would present a 28 1 1 problem for counsel. 2 weeks, until less than three court days before the hearing before 3 informing the court of the conflict. 4 Instead, counsel waited more than six The court cannot grant counsel’s request to appear at 5 the hearing by phone. The motion states that there are 6 “substantial differences” relating to “fundamental issues”, 7 without any elaboration as to what those differences or issues 8 may be. 9 and her attorney in order to properly explore with them the 10 grounds for the motion. The court requires a personal appearance by plaintiff 11 The motion seeks not to substitute counsel but to allow 12 plaintiff’s attorney to withdraw from representation altogether. 13 To grant the motion would leave plaintiff without any legal 14 representation whatsoever. 15 inquire into whether plaintiff is aware of the consequences of 16 proceeding without counsel, including such things as whether she 17 is able to retain new counsel or alternatively whether she is 18 prepared to represent herself. 19 R. 1.16(c) providing that “[a] lawyer shall not terminate a 20 representation until the lawyer has taken reasonable steps to 21 avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the 22 client.” 23 Before doing that, the court needs to See Cal. Rules of Pro. Conduct The court recognizes that travel from Los Angeles to 24 Sacramento to attend the hearing may be costly. 25 plaintiff’s attorney who made the decision to take a case venued 26 in a different district than his office. 27 counsel may have to travel to the courthouse is a factor that any 28 attorney should take into account when deciding to file an action 2 However, it was The probability that 1 in that courthouse. 2 airfare between Los Angeles and Sacramento may be greater when 3 one waits until the last minute to book a flight. 4 5 It should also be apparent that the cost of IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 3, 2025 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?