Jackson v. City of Stockton et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/8/2025 DISMISSING action with prejudice. (Deputy Clerk VLK)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. (SBN 69888)
BEN NISENBAUM, Esq. (SBN 222173)
BRANDON YEE, Esq. (SBN 344583)
BURRIS NISENBAUM CURRY AND LACY, LLP
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

K. CHIKE ODIWE, Esq. (SBN 315109)
LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH CHIKE ODIWE, PC
9 2880 Zanker Road Suite 203, PMB 1689
San Jose, CA 95134
10
Telephone: [phone]
11 Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
8

12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
DARRYL JACKSON

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

20
21
22
23

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff,

18
19

CASE NO.: 2:24-cv-01219-JDP

DARRYL JACKSON, an individual,

v.
ANTHONY PERRY, individually and in his
official capacity as an officer for the Stockton
Police Department; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
individually, jointly, and severally,
Defendants.

24
25
26

1

1

Plaintiff DARRYL JACKSON and defendant ANTHONY PERRY, acting by and through

2

their attorneys of record, herein stipulate for an Order of Dismissal of the Entire Action with

3

prejudice, each side to bear their own fees and costs.

4

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

5

Burris Nisenbaum Curry and Lacy, LLP

6
7

January 7, 2025

__/s/Brandon Yee________
Brandon Yee
Attorney for Plaintiff

8
9

Porter Scott

10
11

January 7, 2025

__/s/ William Camy______
William Camy
Attorney for Defendant

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Having considered the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the entire action is

3
4
5

hereby dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear their own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated:

January 8, 2025
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

3