(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 05/08/2024 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit a complete Motion to Proceed or the appropriate filing fee within 30 days. (Spichka, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY E. MACK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:24-CV-1221-DMC-P v. ORDER ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not filed a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, 19 along with a certified copy of his trust account statement for the six-month period immediately 20 preceding the filing of the complaint, or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 21 1915(a), (a)(2). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit either a completed 22 application to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff is warned that 23 failure to resolve the fee status of this case within the time provided may result in the dismissal of 24 this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local 25 Rule 110. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, 3 within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma 4 pauperis, with the required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing 5 fee; and 6 7 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. 8 9 Dated: May 8, 2024 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?