(PC) Soto v. Sacramento Main Jail et al

Filing 5

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan on 11/22/2024 ORDERING the Assignment of a District Judge; District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan for all further proceedings; RECOMMENDING this Action be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. New Case Number 2:24-cv-1222 DAD SCR (PC). (Becknal, R.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM SOTO,

12
13
14

No. 2:24-cv-01222-SCR P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER AND

SACRAMENTO MAIN JAIL, et al.,

15

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

16
17

A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal

18

service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that

19

a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-

20

three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has

21

failed to notify the Court of a current address.

22
23
24
25

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to
this case.
In addition, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).

26

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
1

1

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

2

and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen

3

days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

4

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

5

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6

Date: November 22, 2024

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2