(PC) Bonilla v. Tulare County Superior Court

Filing 2

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 06/06/24 DISMISSING this case. No further documents will be accepted in this action. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 IN RE: STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA No. 2:24-cv-01448-JAM-CSK No. 2:24-cv-01450-JAM-CSK 13 No. 2:24-cv-01452-JAM-CSK 14 No. 2:24-cv-01453-JAM-CSK 15 No. 2:24-cv-01469-JAM-CSK 16 No. 2:24-cv-01481-JAM-CSK 17 No. 2:24-cv-01484-JAM-CSK 18 No. 2:24-cv-01485-JAM-CSK 19 No. 2:24-cv-01517-JAM-CSK 20 21 22 23 ORDER 24 25 26 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in the 27 above-captioned civil actions. On November 29, 2018, the Court declared Plaintiff a vexatious 28 litigant and ordered the Clerk of the Court not to file or assign a civil case number to any 1 1 proposed habeas corpus petition or civil action related to Plaintiff’s criminal conviction in 2 Alameda County. (See Bonilla v. Fresno County, Case No. 2: 18-cv-2544-TLN-KJN, ECF No. 3 13). On June 14, 2023, the Court modified its vexatious litigant Order and directed the Clerk of 4 the Court to open a new case for each attempted new pleading and assign it to the Court for 5 review. (Id. at ECF No. 26.) If the Court determines the new filing is related to Plaintiff’s 6 Alameda County criminal conviction, the case will be ordered dismissed and closed. (Id.) 7 8 The Court has reviewed the complaints/petitions filed in the above-captioned cases and finds they are related to Plaintiff’s Alameda County criminal conviction. 1 9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 2:24-cv-01448, 2:24-cv-01450, 2:24-cv- 10 01452, 2:24-cv-01453, 2:24-cv-01469, 2:24-cv-01481, 2:24-cv-01484, 2:24-cv-01485 and 2:24- 11 cv-01517 are DISMISSED; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close these cases. No 12 further filings will be accepted. 13 Dated: June 06, 2024 14 15 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 In the caption of 2:24-cv-01448, plaintiff names the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In the caption of 2:24-cv-01469, plaintiff names the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. To the extent plaintiff intended to raise the claims raised in these cases in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, this Court finds that the claims raised in 2:24-cv-01448 and 2:24-cv-01469 are related to Plaintiff’s Alameda County criminal conviction. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?