(HC) Nixon v. Morales

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/3/2024 DENYING 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice to renewal. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRANDON NIXON,

12

Petitioner,

13
14

No. 2:24-CV-1531-DMC-P

v.

ORDER

RAUL MORALES,

15

Respondent.

16
Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas

17
18

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion for the

19

appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3.
There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas

20
21

proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C.

22

§ 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case “if the interests of justice

23

so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the Court does

24

not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present

25

time.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for appointment

2

of counsel, ECF No. 3, is denied without prejudice to renewal, at the earliest, after a response to

3

the petition has been filed.

4
5

Dated: June 3, 2024

____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2