(PC) Venable v. Tally

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 01/24/25 ADOPTING 9 Findings and Recommendations IN FULL; and DISMISSING this action for failure to state a claim without leave to amend. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk KML)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAURICE L. VENABLE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 TALLY, 15 No. 2:24-cv-01779-TLN-JDP ORDER Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Maurice L. Veneable (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed 17 18 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 20, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff has 23 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 10.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 1 2 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 20, 2024 (ECF No. 9), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim without leave to amend; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this action. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: January 24, 2025 8 9 10 11 12 ___________________________________ TROY L. NUNLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?