(PC) Venable v. Tally
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 01/24/25 ADOPTING 9 Findings and Recommendations IN FULL; and DISMISSING this action for failure to state a claim without leave to amend. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk KML)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MAURICE L. VENABLE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
TALLY,
15
No. 2:24-cv-01779-TLN-JDP
ORDER
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff Maurice L. Veneable (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed
17
18
this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
19
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On December 20, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff has
23
filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 10.)
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
///
1
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 20, 2024 (ECF No. 9), are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
4
2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim without leave to amend; and
5
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this action.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: January 24, 2025
8
9
10
11
12
___________________________________
TROY L. NUNLEY
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?