(SS) Babros v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/25/2024 AWARDING fees and expenses in the amount of $1,759.76 and $405.00 in costs. (Becknal, R.)
1 Francesco Benavides, CSBN 258924
Law Offices of Francesco Benavides
2
1990 N. California Blvd. 8th Floor
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
3
Tel: (925) 222-7071
4
Email: francesco@benavidesdisabilitylaw.com
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
6 GLENN RUSSELL BABROS
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
GLENN RUSSELL BABROS,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
Case No. 2:24-cv-01811-AC
STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND
PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND
EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
MARTIN J. O’MALLEY,
16 Commissioner of Social Security,
17
Defendant.
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their
19
undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded
20
attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $1,759.76, under the Equal Access to
21
Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and $405.00 in costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920.
22
23 This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of
24 Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
25 §§ 2412(d), 1920.
26
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will
27 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to
28 Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability
1 to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset
2 allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After
3 the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are
4 subject to any offset.
5
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
6 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause
7 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Plaintiff’s counsel,
8 Francesco Benavides, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff.
9
Fees shall be made payable by check or electronic funds transfer.
10
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for
11 EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
12 Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall
13 constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or
14 Francesco Benavides, including the Law Offices of Francesco Benavides, may have
15 relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
16
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Francesco Benavides to seek
17 Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings
18 clause provisions of the EAJA.
19
20
Respectfully submitted,
21
22
23
24
25
Dated: September 25, 2024
Law Offices of Francesco Benavides
By:
/s/ Francesco Benavides
FRANCESCO P. BENAVIDES
Attorney for Plaintiff
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
Dated: September 25, 2024
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
MATHEW W. PILE
Associate General Counsel
Social Security Administration
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
By:
Jennifer Lee Tarn*
JENNIFER LEE TARN
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
(*Permission to use electronic signature
obtained via email on September 25, 2024).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access
to Justice Act Fees and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the
5 amount of $1,759.76 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and $405.00 in costs under 28
6 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.
7
8
9
10
DATE: September 25, 2024
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?