(PC) Singh v. Rio Cosumnes Correction Center

Filing 11

ORDER signed by District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 11/22/2024 ADOPTING 9 Findings and Recommendations in Full, DISMISSING this action without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action and failure to comply with court orders, DENYING 6 Motion to Dismiss as Moot, and DIRECTING the court to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Woodson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GURPREET SINGH,

12
13
14
15
16
17

No. 2:24-cv-01831-DC-JDP (PC)

Plaintiff,
v.
RIO COSUMNES CORRECTION
CENTER,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
THIS ACTION
(Doc. Nos. 6, 9)

Defendant.
Plaintiff Gurpreet Singh is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to

18

42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

19

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On November 4, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and

21

recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to

22

Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. (Doc. No. 9.) In particular,

23

Plaintiff failed to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s pending

24

motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 6), and Plaintiff failed to file a response to the order to show cause

25

the court issued on October 9, 2024 (Doc. No. 8). The pending findings and recommendations

26

were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within

27

fourteen (14) days after service. (Doc. No. 9 at 3.) To date, no objections to the findings and

28

recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed.
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a

2

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the

3

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

4

Accordingly:

5

1.

6

The findings and recommendations issued on November 4, 2024 (Doc. No. 9) are
adopted in full;

7

2.

8

This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute
this action and failure to comply with court orders;

9

3.

10

Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is denied as having been
rendered moot by this order; and

11

4.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15

Dated:

November 22, 2024

___________________________
Dena Coggins
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2