(SS) Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/26/24 EXTENDING time to 12/06/24 for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE Associate General Counsel Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 Oscar Gonzalez de Llano Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235 Telephone: (510) 970-4818 Email: Oscar.Gonzalez@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 VINCENT BERNARD DAVIS, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 18 19 No. 2:24-cv-01874-CKD STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective 22 counsel of record, with the Court’s approval, that Defendant’s time for responding to Plaintiff’s 23 Motion for Summary Judgment be extended fourteen (14) days from November 22, 2024 to 24 December 6, 2024. This is Defendant’s second request for an extension. Counsel for Plaintiff 25 has no objection to Defendant’s request for an extension. 26 27 28 Good cause exists for this request. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Counsel for Defendant has and will be unable to devote the time required to complete its 1 response. Counsel has multiple merit briefs currently due in district court cases within the next 2 week. Counsel for Defendant was out of the office the past couple days providing care for his 3 child that is out sick and Counsel will also be out of the office on November 26-29, 2024. Given 4 competing workload requirements and pending travel an extension until December 6, 2024 will 5 provide the opportunity for the undersigned Counsel for Defendant to prioritize completing the 6 response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The undersigned Counsel apologizes to 7 the Court and Plaintiff’s counsel for any inconvenience caused by this request and delay. All 8 other dates in the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. 9 Respectfully submitted, 10 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 11 12 13 DATE: November 22, 2024 14 By: s/ Oscar Gonzalez de Llano OSCAR GONZALEZ DE LLANO Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 15 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC 18 19 DATE: November 22, 2024 By: s/ Steven Gilbert Rosales * Steven Gilbert Rosales (*as authorized by email) Attorney for Plaintiff 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s stipulated motion for extension of time (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED. Defendant shall have an extension, up to and including December 6, 2024, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Dated: November 26, 2024 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?