(PC) Ramos v. Corsaletti

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 01/24/25 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations IN FULL; and DISMISSING this action for failure to state a claim without leave to amend. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk KML)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK RAMOS, 12 No. 2:24-cv-01890-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 CORSALETTI, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Frank Ramos (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 18, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 11.) No objections to the findings and 23 recommendations have been filed. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 27 1. 28 The Findings and Recommendations filed November 18, 2024 (ECF No. 11), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 1 1 2 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders; and 3 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Date: January 24, 2025 6 7 8 9 ___________________________________ TROY L. NUNLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?