(PS) Cramer v. El Dorado Superior Court et al
Filing
5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/11/2025 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Deputy Clerk OML)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID WESTON CRAMER,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:24-cv-01982-DJC-CKD PS
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
EL DORADO COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT, et. al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action attempting to state a claim for an alleged civil rights
19
violation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) This matter was referred to the undersigned by
20
Local Rule 302(c)(3) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
21
On September 30, 2024, the court issued an order and findings and recommendations
22
screening the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and dismissing the complaint with leave
23
to amend. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint or to file a
24
notice of voluntary dismissal of the action. Plaintiff was warned that failure to respond would
25
result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time granted for plaintiff to respond
26
has expired and plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor filed a motion for voluntary
27
dismissal.
28
Based on the foregoing, IT IS RECOMMENDED:
1
1
2
1. This action be dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 41(b); and
3
2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case.
4
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
5
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
6
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
7
with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
8
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
9
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
10
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
11
Dated: March 11, 2025
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
Cramerfta.01982
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?