(HC) Brooks v. The People
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 3/11/2025 ORDERING, within 30 days, petitioner shall file an opposition, if any, to the 11 motion to dismiss. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismis sed for lack of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on petitioner's failure to comply with these rules and a court order. Said failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Deputy Clerk KLY)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROY BROOKS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:24-cv-2084 DC CSK P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
GENA JONES, Warden,
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 14, 2025, respondent filed a motion to dismiss.
19
(ECF No. 11.) Petitioner did not file an opposition to the motion.
20
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written
21
opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to
22
the granting of the motion . . . .” L.R. 230(l). Individuals proceeding pro se are bound by
23
the Court’s Local Rules the same as licensed attorneys. See L.R. 183 (“Any individual
24
representing himself or herself without an attorney is bound by the Federal Rules of Civil or
25
Criminal Procedure, these Rules, and all other applicable law. All obligations placed on ‘counsel’
26
by these Rules apply to individuals appearing in propria persona.”).
27
28
In addition, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides:
Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the [petitioner] fails to prosecute
1
1
or to comply with these rules or a court order, a [respondent] may
move to dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the
dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision
(b) and any dismissal not under this rule—except one for lack of
jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule
19—operates as an adjudication on the merits.
2
3
4
5
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
6
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date
7
of this order, petitioner shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss. Failure to file an
8
opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack of prosecution;
9
and (b) action dismissed based on petitioner’s failure to comply with these rules and a court order.
10
Said failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal
11
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
12
13
Dated: March 11, 2025
14
15
/1/broo2084.nop.hc
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?