(SS) Yanez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 1/24/2025 EXTENDING the deadline to 2/26/25 for the defendant to respond to the 10 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Deputy Clerk AMW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MICHELE BECKWITH Acting United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE Associate General Counsel Office of the General Counsel, Office 7 JEFFREY E. STAPLES, WA 45035 Special Assistant United States Attorney 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235 E-Mail: jeff.staples@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ) CIVIL NO. 2:24-cv-02285-CSK VERONICA YANEZ, ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ) ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME v. ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) 18 Pending the Court’s approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the 19 parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to 20 21 22 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended thirty (30) days from January 27, 2025, up to and including February 26, 2025. This is the Defendant’s first request for an extension. 23 The undersigned is in the process of drafting a response to Plaintiff’s Motion for 24 Summary Judgment, but that draft is undergoing comprehensive reviews by other attorneys that 25 require additional time to complete. If the reviews are completed prior to February 26, 2025, the 26 27 28 undersigned will file a response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement as soon as possible. Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Extension of Time – 2:24-cv-02285-CSK 1 2 The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. 3 4 5 Respectfully submitted, Dated: January 23, 2025 /s/ Jared T. Walker * (*as authorized via e-mail on January 22, 2025) JARED T. WALKER Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: January 23, 2025 MICHELLE BECKWITH United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE Associate General Counsel Social Security Administration 6 7 8 9 10 By: 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant 14 ORDER 15 16 /s/ Jeffrey E. Staples JEFFREY E. STAPLES Special Assistant United States Attorney Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant shall have an 17 extension, up to and including February 26, 2025, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 18 Judgment. 19 20 DATED: January 24, 2025 21 22 HON. CHI SOO KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5, yane.2285.24 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Extension of Time – 2:24-cv-02285-CSK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?