(SS) Dawson v Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/25/24 EXTENDING the following dates: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment due 01/02/25 with Defendant's Opposition/Cross-Motion due 02/03/25. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 2 3 4 5 6 548 Market Street, Suite 38822 San Francisco, California 94104-5401 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 Email: hps@sackettlaw.com 7 8 Attorney for Plaintiff 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JAIME S. DAWSON, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 v. MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:24-cv-02407-DAD-DMC STIPULATION AND ORDER 19 20 Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff 21 shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until January 2, 2025, in which to e-file her Motion 22 for Summary Judgment which is due on December 2, 2024. Defendant shall file any opposition, 23 including cross-motion, on or before February 3, 2025. This extension is necessitated due to the 24 number of cases Plaintiff’s counsel must brief for this court and the Ninth Circuit Court of 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 1 Appeals. Plaintiff makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the 2 proceedings. Defendant has no objection and has stipulated to the requested relief. 3 4 Dated: November 19, 2024 /s/HARVEY P. SACKETT HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff JAIME S. DAWSON Dated: November 19, 2024 /s/JUSTIN LANE MARTIN JUSTIN LANE MARTIN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration [*As authorized by email 11/19/24] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS ORDERED. 14 15 DATED: NOVEMBER 25, 2024 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?