(PC) Hill v. Tom et al
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/25/2024 TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Spichka, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CYMEYON HILL,
12
13
14
No. 2:24-cv-02461-EFB (PC)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
TOM, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 1915.
20
The federal venue statute provides that a civil action “may be brought in (1) a judicial
21
district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the
22
district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions
23
giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action
24
is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in
25
this action, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal
26
jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).
27
28
In this case, the claim arose in Napa County, which is in the Northern District of
California. Therefore, plaintiff’s claim should have been filed in the United States District Court
1
1
for the Northern District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a
2
complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v.
3
McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
4
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California.
6
7
Dated: September 25, 2024
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?