(PC) Wright v. Percil et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan on 01/29/2025 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit a completed Motion to Proceed IFP with a certified copy of the inmate trust account statement within 30 days. (Deputy Clerk KS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEWAYNE A. WRIGHT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 PERCIL, ET AL., 15 No. 24-cv-02739 SCR P ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, the certificate portion of the in forma pauperis application has not 20 been filled out and signed by an authorized prison official. Also, plaintiff has not filed a certified 21 copy of the inmate trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the 22 filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be provided another 23 opportunity to submit a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. The Clerk of the Court shall provide plaintiff with another copy of the in forma 26 pauperis application used by this court; 27 2. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed 28 affidavit in support of the request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk 1 1 of Court, and a certified copy of the inmate trust account statement for the six-month period 2 immediately preceding the filing of the complaint; and 3 3. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this 4 action be dismissed without prejudice. 5 DATED: January 29, 2025 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?