(PC) Wright v. Percil et al
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan on 01/29/2025 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit a completed Motion to Proceed IFP with a certified copy of the inmate trust account statement within 30 days. (Deputy Clerk KS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DEWAYNE A. WRIGHT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
PERCIL, ET AL.,
15
No. 24-cv-02739 SCR P
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, the certificate portion of the in forma pauperis application has not
20
been filled out and signed by an authorized prison official. Also, plaintiff has not filed a certified
21
copy of the inmate trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the
22
filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be provided another
23
opportunity to submit a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.
24
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1. The Clerk of the Court shall provide plaintiff with another copy of the in forma
26
pauperis application used by this court;
27
2. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed
28
affidavit in support of the request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk
1
1
of Court, and a certified copy of the inmate trust account statement for the six-month period
2
immediately preceding the filing of the complaint; and
3
3. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this
4
action be dismissed without prejudice.
5
DATED: January 29, 2025
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?