(PC) Van Huisen v. Covello et al

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/24/2025 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations in Full, DISMISSING the 1 Complaint without leave to amend for failure to state a claim, and DIRECTING the court to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk AMW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, 12 No. 2:24-cv-02905-TLN-AC Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PATRICK COVELLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Gregory Scott Van Huisen (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed 18 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 15, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 11.) The 23 findings and recommendations were served again on November 27, 2024, after Plaintiff filed a 24 notice of change of address. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and 25 recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 26 27 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 11) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 2. The Complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a claim; and 4 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Date: January 24, 2025 7 8 9 10 ___________________________________ TROY L. NUNLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?