(SS) Rubio v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/27/2025 EXTENDING the Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to 3/10/2025. (Deputy Clerk RRB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MICHELE BECKWITH
Acting United States Attorney
MATHEW W. PILE, WSBN 32245
Associate General Counsel
Office of Program Litigation, Office 7
Social Security Administration
JUSTIN L. MARTIN, MO 62255
Special Assistant United States Attorney
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Telephone: (206) 615-3735
E-Mail: justin.l.martin@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
14
15
ANTHONY JAMES RUBIO,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
Civil No. 2:24-cv-03277-AC
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE
ELECTRONIC CERTIFIED
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AS THE
ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
19
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
Pending the Court’s approval, the parties stipulate through their respective counsel that
24
Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), shall have a forty-five-
25
day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint in this case from January 24, 2025, up to
26
and including March 10, 2025. In support of this request, the Commissioner respectfully states as
27
28
follows:
1. Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due to be filed by January 24, 2025.
Stip. For Ext; 2:24-cv-03277-AC
-1-
1
Defendant has not previously requested an extension of this deadline.
2
2. In accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, recently amended to add
3
Supplemental Rules for Social Security review cases under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the
4
Commissioner files a certified administrative record (CAR) as the Answer to a
5
Complaint for review.
6
7
3. Counsel for the Commissioner has been informed by the client agency, which is the
8
Social Security Administration, Office of Appellate Operations, that the CAR is not
9
fully prepared in this matter. The client agency therefore needs more time to prepare
10
the CAR for the Court’s review.
12
4. For this reason, Defendant requests an extension to March 10, 2025 (45 days), to file
13
an Answer or other response in this matter.
14
5. Counsel for the Commissioner has consulted with Plaintiff’s counsel who advised that
15
she has no objection to this extension request.
16
6. This request is made in good faith and is not intended to delay the proceedings in this
17
18
matter.
19
7. I am attempting to preserve limited judicial resources and have applied the most rapid
20
response under the circumstances.
21
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests until March 10, 2025, to respond to Plaintiff’s
22
23
24
Complaint.
///
25
26
27
28
Stip. For Ext; 2:24-cv-03277-AC
-2-
1
2
Respectfully submitted,
DATE: January 27, 2025
Lehrkind Law Office
3
/s/ Margaret Lehrkind*
MARGARET LEHRKIND
Attorney for Plaintiff
(*as authorized via email on January 23, 2025)
4
5
6
MICHELE BECKWITH
Acting United States Attorney
7
MATHEW W. PILE
Associate General Counsel
Office of Program Litigation, Office 7
Social Security Administration
8
9
10
13
s/ Justin L. Martin
JUSTIN L. MARTIN
Special Assistant United States Attorney
14
Attorneys for Defendant
12
DATE: January 27, 2025
15
16
By
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.
17
18
19
DATE: January 27, 2025
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. For Ext; 2:24-cv-03277-AC
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?