(SS) Benephraim v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 03/06/25 EXTENDING the time to file Plaintiffs 12 Motion for Summary Judgment to 04/03/25. (Deputy Clerk KML)
1
2
3
4
5
Michelle J. Shvarts (SBN 235300)
DISABILITY ADVOCATES GROUP
18321 Ventura Blvd., Ste 355
Encino, CA 91356
TEL: (800) 935-3170
mshvarts@dagaccess.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Riora Benephraim
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
RIORA BENEPHRAIM
(SSN XXX-XX-3174),
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendant,
) Case No.: 2:24-cv-3310-CSK
)
)
)
) STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE (FIRST
) REQUEST)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned attorneys,
2
subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall have a thirty day extension
3
to April 3, 2025, in which to deliver her the Motion for Summary Judgment. The
4
deadline for Defendant’s portion of the joint stipulation, the Plaintiff’s optional
5
reply shall also be extended according to the time allotted by the Court’s case
6
management order.
7
This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension. This extension is requested
9
so that Plaintiff’s counsel of record can attend to a family emergency.
Respectfully submitted,
10
DISABILITY ADVOCATES GROUP
8
11
12
Dated: March 3, 2025
13
14
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
15
United States Attorney
16
17
By: /s/ Michelle J. Shvarts
MICHELLE J. SHVARTS
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: March 3, 2025
18
19
20
By: /s/ ___________________
Justin Martin
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
(as approved by email)
21
22
ORDER
23
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that, for good
24
cause shown, Plaintiff shall have an extension of time until April 3, 2025 to file her
25
motion for summary judgment.
26
Dated: 03/06/25
27
28
5, bene.3310.24
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?