Seijas v. The Jackson Laboratory, et al.,
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 1/27/2025 EXTENDING the deadline for defendant The Jackson Laboratory's to respond to the #1 Complaint to 2/10/25. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint by 2/10/25, and all parties shall file a joint rule report by 2/28/25. (Deputy Clerk AMW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Justin T. Curley (SBN 233287)
jcurley@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 397-2823
Facsimile:
(415) 397-8549
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Jeffrey A. Nordlander (SBN 308929)
jnordlander@seyfarth.com
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
Sacramento, California 95814-4428
Telephone:
(916) 448-0159
Facsimile:
(916) 558-4839
Attorneys for Defendant
THE JACKSON LABORATORY dba THE JACKSON
LABORATORY, WEST
16
LAWYERS For JUSTICE, PC
Arby Aiwazian (SBN 269827)
aa@calljustice.com
Arman Marukyan (SBN 327150)
arman@calljustice.com
Dominic Scarangella (SBN 347695)
d.scarangella@calljustice.com
450 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 900
Glendale, California 91203
Telephone: (818) 265-1020
Facsimile: (818) 265-1021
17
Attorneys for Plaintiff EMMALIE SEIJAS
12
13
14
15
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
22
EMMALIE SEIJAS, individually, and on behalf of
other members of the general public similarly
situated and on behalf of other aggrieved
employees pursuant to the California Private
Attorneys General Act;
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
v.
THE JACKSON LABORATORY, an unknown
business entity; THE JACKSON LABORATORY,
WEST, a Maine corporation; and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:24-cv-03423-DJC-AC
HON. DANIEL J. CALABRETTA
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT THE
JACKSON LABORATORY dba THE
JACKSON LABORATORY, WEST TO
FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
PARTIES TO FILE JOINT RULE 26(f)
REPORT; ORDER
Complaint filed: October 10, 2024
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
1
Plaintiff Emmalie Seijas and Defendant The Jackson Laboratory dba The Jackson Laboratory,
2
West, by their counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), hereby stipulate to
3
extending the time, by twenty-one (21) days, through and including January 27, 2025, for Defendant to
4
file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
5
6
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed this action in Sacramento County Superior Court on October 18,
2024,
7
8
WHEREAS, Defendant removed Plaintiff’s Complaint to this Court pursuant to the Class Action
Fairness Act of 2005 on December 9, 2024,
9
WHEREAS, Defendant’s responsive pleading deadline was initially December 16, 2024, which
10
the Parties stipulated to extend by 21 days, until January 6, 2025, while the Parties met and conferred
11
regarding Plaintiff’s Complaint,
12
13
WHEREAS, pursuant to pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), this stipulation was automatically
effective upon filing of this stipulation without further action by the Court,
14
WHEREAS, to address Defendant’s contention that Plaintiff’s Complaint does not comply with
15
the pleading standards set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 8, Plaintiff has agreed to file an
16
Amended Complaint,
17
WHEREAS, on January 3, 2025, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time For
18
Defendant to File a Responsive Pleading to extend Defendant’s responsive pleading deadline to January
19
27, 2025 which was signed into order on January 7, 2025,
20
21
WHEREAS, Plaintiff is preparing an Amended Complaint, but will be unable to file the
Amended Complaint before Defendant’s responsive pleading deadline on January 27, 2025,
22
WHEREAS, so that Defendant is not unnecessarily required to respond to Plaintiff’s initial
23
Complaint, by motion to dismiss or otherwise, pending Plaintiff’s filing her Amended Complaint, the
24
Parties hereby stipulate to extend Defendant’s responsive pleading deadline by 14 days, or until
25
February 10, 2025,
26
WHEREAS, the Parties current deadline to file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report is February 7, 2025,
27
///
28
///
1
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
1
WHEREAS, the so that the Parties may have adequate time to finalize the pleadings prior to
2
submitting their Joint Rule 26(f) Report, the Parties hereby stipulate to extend the Parties’ deadline to
3
file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report by 21 days, or until February 28, 2025.
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6
DATED: January 27, 2025
7
Respectfully submitted,
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
8
9
By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Nordlander
Justin T. Curley
Jeffrey A. Nordlander
Attorneys for Defendant
THE JACKSON LABORATORY dba THE
JACKSON LABORATORY, WEST
10
11
12
13
14
15
DATED: January 27, 2025
Respectfully submitted,
LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE, PC
16
17
18
19
By: /s/ Dominic Scarangella
Arman Marukyan
Dominic Scarangella
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EMMALIE SEIJAS
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
1
2
3
Based on the Parties’ Joint Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court GRANTS
the Parties’ Joint Stipulation and orders as follows:
1.
4
Defendant The Jackson Laboratory’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is
hereby extended to February 10, 2025.
5
2.
Plaintiff shall file her Amended Complaint on or before February 10, 2025.
6
3.
The Parties shall file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report on or before February 28, 2025.
7
IT IS ORDERED.
8
9
10
Dated: January 27, 2025
/s/ Daniel J. Calabretta
THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING; ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?