Boatman v. Tesla Inc.

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/8/2025 APPROVING 7 Stipulation and all of plaintiff's claims asserted in complaint in this action shall be subject to arbitration and the proceeding shall be STAYED pending the outcome of the arbitration. (Deputy Clerk AMW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KIRAN S. LOPEZ (SBN 252467) TESLA, INC. 31353 Huntwood Avenue Hayward, CA 94544 Telephone: (510) 391-0702 kirlopez@tesla.com Attorney for Defendant TESLA, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARTHUR LEE BOATMAN JR., an individual, Case No. 2:24-cv-03694-CKD 12 13 14 15 [PROPOSED] MODIFIED ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO: Plaintiff, v. (1) ARBITRATE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS; AND TESLA INC.; A Corporation Doing Business in California; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, (2) STAY PROCEEDINGS 16 17 [Filed concurrently with Stipulation to Arbitrate Plaintiff’s Claims and Stay Proceedings] Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] MODIFIED ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO ARBITRATE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT AND STAY PROCEEDINGS 1 Based on the Stipulation entered into by and between Plaintiff Arthur Lee Boatman, Jr. 2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Tesla, Inc. (“Defendant”) (Plaintiff and Defendant are collectively referred to 3 herein as the “Parties”), by and through the Parties’ counsel of record, IT IS SO ORDERED that: 4 (1) All of Plaintiff’s claims asserted in his complaint in this action shall be subject to arbitration; 5 and 6 (2) The proceeding shall be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration. 7 The Parties’ Stipulation is APPROVED. 8 Dated: 01/08/25 9 10 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 5, boat.3694.24 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] MODIFIED ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO ARBITRATE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT AND STAY PROCEEDINGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?