Kaur v. Jaddou et al
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR TEMPORARY STAY signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/6/2025. (Deputy Clerk LMS)
1 MICHELE BECKWITH
Acting United States Attorney
2 ELLIOT C. WONG
Assistant United States Attorney
3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
5
6 Attorneys for Defendants
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CASE NO. 2:25-CV-00097-AC
RAJBIR KAUR,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
v.
14
UR JADDOU, ET AL.,
15
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
TEMPORARY STAY
Defendant.
16
17
18
The Defendants respectfully request to stay this case through September 19, 2025, and counsel
19 for Plaintiffs does not oppose. In this case, Plaintiffs allege that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
20 Services (“USCIS”) has unreasonably delayed scheduling an interview on Plaintiff Kaur’s pending
21 asylum application, which she filed in 2019. USCIS has scheduled Plaintiff Kaur’s asylum interview for
22 May 22,2025. The parties anticipate that this lawsuit will be rendered moot once USCIS completes its
23 adjudication of Plaintiff Kaur’s application, and USCIS anticipates it will do so within 120 days
24 following the successful complete of Plaintiff’s asylum interview. If USCIS needs to reschedule
25 Plaintiff’s interview, it will endeavor to do so within four weeks.
26
27 / / /
28
1
1
The parties therefore stipulate that this matter be stayed September 19, 2025. The parties further
2 request that all other filing deadlines be similarly vacated.
3
4 Respectfully submitted,
5
6
Dated: March 5, 2025
MICHELE BECKWITH
Acting United States Attorney
7
8
By: /s/ ELLIOT C. WONG
ELLIOT C. WONG
Assistant United States Attorney
9
10
11
Dated: March 5, 2025
By:
/s/ JESSICA T. ARENA
JESSICA T. ARENA
Counsel for Plaintiffs
12
13
14
[PROPOSED] ORDER
15
16
It is so ordered.
17
18
19 Dated: March 6, 2025
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?