Kaur v. Jaddou et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR TEMPORARY STAY signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/6/2025. (Deputy Clerk LMS)

Download PDF
1 MICHELE BECKWITH Acting United States Attorney 2 ELLIOT C. WONG Assistant United States Attorney 3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CASE NO. 2:25-CV-00097-AC RAJBIR KAUR, Plaintiffs, 12 13 v. 14 UR JADDOU, ET AL., 15 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR TEMPORARY STAY Defendant. 16 17 18 The Defendants respectfully request to stay this case through September 19, 2025, and counsel 19 for Plaintiffs does not oppose. In this case, Plaintiffs allege that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration 20 Services (“USCIS”) has unreasonably delayed scheduling an interview on Plaintiff Kaur’s pending 21 asylum application, which she filed in 2019. USCIS has scheduled Plaintiff Kaur’s asylum interview for 22 May 22,2025. The parties anticipate that this lawsuit will be rendered moot once USCIS completes its 23 adjudication of Plaintiff Kaur’s application, and USCIS anticipates it will do so within 120 days 24 following the successful complete of Plaintiff’s asylum interview. If USCIS needs to reschedule 25 Plaintiff’s interview, it will endeavor to do so within four weeks. 26 27 / / / 28 1 1 The parties therefore stipulate that this matter be stayed September 19, 2025. The parties further 2 request that all other filing deadlines be similarly vacated. 3 4 Respectfully submitted, 5 6 Dated: March 5, 2025 MICHELE BECKWITH Acting United States Attorney 7 8 By: /s/ ELLIOT C. WONG ELLIOT C. WONG Assistant United States Attorney 9 10 11 Dated: March 5, 2025 By: /s/ JESSICA T. ARENA JESSICA T. ARENA Counsel for Plaintiffs 12 13 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER 15 16 It is so ordered. 17 18 19 Dated: March 6, 2025 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?