(PS) Allahyar v. Momand
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/12/2025 DIRECTING the Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file a fully completed and signed affidavit to proceed without prepayment of fees within 30 days from the date of this Order. (Deputy Clerk OML)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROHULLAH ALLAHYAR,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. 2:25-cv-0102-TLN-CKD (PS)
ORDER
v.
DAMAN MOMAND,
Defendant.
17
18
Plaintiff Rohullah Allahyar proceeds without counsel and seeks to proceed in forma
19
pauperis. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C.
20
§ 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has initiated this action with a civil complaint and an application to proceed
21
in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 2.)
22
In order to commence a civil action, along with the complaint, a plaintiff must either pay
23
the $350.00 filing fee and the $55.00 administrative fee or file an application requesting leave to
24
proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). The court may authorize the commencement of
25
an action “without prepayment of fees” by an individual who submits an affidavit evidencing an
26
inability to pay such fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). “An affidavit in support of an IFP application is
27
sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and still afford the necessities
28
of life.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015) (citing Adkins v. E.I. Du
1
1
Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948)); see also United States v. McQuade, 647
2
F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981) (affidavit must “state the facts as to affiant’s poverty with some
3
particularity, definiteness and certainty” (internal quotation omitted)).
4
Plaintiff’s affidavit does not demonstrate plaintiff was unable to pay the court costs and
5
still afford the necessities of life when plaintiff filed this suit. According to the affidavit, plaintiff
6
receives $800 per week in take-home pay or wages and plaintiff provided no further information
7
for the court to consider, leaving blank all other sections of the form. (ECF No. 2.) Thus, plaintiff
8
has indicated a regular source of income and no expenses. While § 1915(a) does not require a
9
litigant to demonstrate “absolute destitution,” Adkins, 335 U.S. at 339, the applicant must
10
nonetheless show inability to pay the fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff has not done so.
11
Because plaintiff does not make an adequate showing of indigency for in forma pauperis
12
status, plaintiff will be granted 30 days in which to submit the filing fee and administrative fee to
13
the Clerk of the Court in order to proceed with this case. In the alternative, plaintiff may file a
14
renewed application to proceed IFP which contains sufficient information to demonstrate plaintiff
15
could not pay the court costs and still afford the necessities of life. Plaintiff is cautioned that
16
failure to pay the court costs or file a renewed IFP affidavit will result in a recommendation that
17
the application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the present action be dismissed.
18
For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days
19
from the date of this order, plaintiff shall pay the filing fee and administrative fee or file a fully
20
completed and signed affidavit to proceed without prepayment of fees.
21
Dated: March 12, 2025
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
8, alla25cv0102.ifp
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?