Noble v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 03/05/25 GRANTING 9 Motion and EXTENDING the time for Defendants to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until the Judicial Panel on MDL rules on the pending motion. (Deputy Clerk KML)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

)
ALYSHA NOBLE, on behalf of herself and as )
parent and guardian of her minor child, R.J.S., )
and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
POWERSCHOOL HOLDINGS, INC. and
)
POWERSCHOOL GROUP LLC,
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No. 2:25-cv-00485-TLN-CKD
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER,
MOVE, OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT

1

ORDER

2

The Court ORDERS as follows:

3

The time for Defendants to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be

4

extended until such time as the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation rules on the pending

5

motion before it in this case and the related actions (the “MDL Motion”).

6

If the pending MDL Motion seeking transfer for multidistrict litigation pretrial

7

proceedings is granted, the time for Defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the

8

Complaint shall be extended until a consolidated scheduling order is entered by a transferee

9

court.

10

If the pending MDL Motion is denied, the time for Defendants to move, answer, or

11

otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be 30 days from the date of such order denying

12

centralization.

13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 5, 2025

____________________________
Troy L. Nunley
Chief United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT