(PS) Lee v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. et al
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 3/6/2025 DENYING 2 Motion file electronically and REMINDING plaintiff that he must serve each defendant with a copy of the summons and complaint within ninety days of the date his complaint was filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (Deputy Clerk RRB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD J. LEE,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 2:25-cv-0558-DC-JDP (PS)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, requests permission to file documents electronically in
18
this action. ECF No. 2. Generally, “any person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing
19
except with permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(b)(2).
20
“Requests to use paper or electronic filing as exceptions from these Rules shall be submitted as
21
stipulations as provided in L.R. 143 or, if a stipulation cannot be had, as written motions setting
22
out an explanation of reasons for the exception.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(b)(3).
23
Plaintiff appears to argue that he should be permitted to file documents electronically so
24
that he is not required to conventionally serve defendants’ counsel with each document he files in
25
this case. ECF No. 2 at 2. Assuming each defendant appears through counsel, defendants will
26
automatically receive service of all documents that plaintiff files through the court’s case
27
management and electronic case files system. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(a) and 135(a). Further,
28
plaintiff has not shown that he will suffer any prejudice by having to file paper documents with
1
1
the clerk’s office. He therefore has not demonstrated good cause for a departure from the normal
2
filing procedure for unrepresented litigants.
3
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
4
1. Plaintiff’s request to file electronically, ECF No. 2, is DENIED.
5
2. Plaintiff is reminded that he must serve each defendant with a copy of the summons
6
and complaint within ninety days of the date his complaint was filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m)
7
(“If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or
8
on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that
9
defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.”).
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated:
13
14
March 6, 2025
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?