Robinson v. Delgado et al

Filing 221

WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to transport issued for plaintiff to appear in US District Court on June 24, 2009. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 6/17/09. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP THOMAS J. FRIEL, JR. (80065) (tfriel@cooley.com) JAMES DONATO (146140) (jdonato@cooley.com) ANGELA DUNNING (212047) (adunning@cooley.com) ERIN DOMINGUEZ (252954) (edominguez@cooley.com) 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 Attorneys for Plaintiff ANTHONY L. ROBINSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION ANTHONY L. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. ROGELIO DELGADO, et al., Defendants. Case No. C02-1538 NJV (PR) WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM AND ORDER Status Conference Date: June 24, 2009 Time: 8:00 a.m. Place: U.S. District Court Northern Division 450 Golden Gate Avenue 17th Floor, Courtroom 2 San Francisco, CA 94102 Judge: Honorable Nandor J. Vadas 1136864 v1/SF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM AND ORDER C02-1538 NJV (PR) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O Anthony L. Robinson ("Robinson") (E-91884), a necessary and material witness in proceedings in this case, is confined in the California State Prison Sacramento ("CSP Sac") in Represa, California 95671, in the custody of the warden. In order to secure this inmate's attendance at the status conference, it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate to the U. S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 17th floor, Courtroom 2 in San Francisco, California, 94102 on June 24, 2009, no later than 8:00 a.m. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum issue, under seal of this Court, directing CSP - Sac: (1) to transfer Robinson to the U. S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 17th Floor, Courtroom 2, San Francisco, California 94102, for arrival no later than 8:00 a.m. on Wednesday, June 24, 2009; and (2) to transfer Robinson back to CSP - Sac as soon as the status conference is completed; 2. The custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any change in Robinson's custody and to provide the new custodian with a copy of this Writ; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum and Order to the Out-to-Court Desk, California State Prison Sacramento, P.O. Box 290002, Represa, CA 95671. 1136864 v1/SF 1 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM AND ORDER C02-1538 NJV (PR) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM To: Warden of California State Prison Sacramento: YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED: (1) to transfer Robinson to U. S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 17th Floor, Courtroom 2, San Francisco, California, 94102 for arrival no later than 8:00 a.m. on Wednesday, June 24, 2009; and (2) to transfer Robinson back to California State Prison Sacramento as soon as the status conference is STR DI completed; to provide the new custodian with a copy of this Writ. UNIT ED S ICT ES C AT of any change in Robinson's custody and FURTHER, you are ordered to notify the T Court 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O RN F D IS T IC T O R 1136864 v1/SF 2 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM AND ORDER C02-1538 NJV (PR) A 12 LI FO 11 June 17, 2009 Dated: ________________________ das or J. Va _____________________________________ ge Nand Jud Honorable Nandor J. Vadas E United States Magistrate Judge C R NIA I ORD T IS SO ERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?