Seals v. Mitchell et al

Filing 133

ORDER re 132 Stipulation filed by Michael Izell Seals. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 8/20/2010. (hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SA N F R A N C I S C O

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Al Pfeiffer (Bar No. 120965) [e-mail] Ashley Bauer (Bar No. 231626) [e-mail] Meghna Subramanian (Bar No. 251513) [e-mail] 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111-6538 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael Izell Seals JONES & DYER A Professional Corporation Mark A. Jones (Bar No. 96494) [e-mail] Kristen K. Preston (Bar No. 125455) [e-mail] 1800 J Street Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants John Rynhart Lyle Thomas UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Michael Izell Seals, Plaintiff, v. Officer Rodney K. Mitchell, et al. Defendants.

CASE NO. C-04-3764 NJV ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR AMENDING ANSWER AND FILING MOTION TO STRIKE

Defendants John Rynhart and Lyle Thomas filed their Amended Answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint on July 30, 2010. Defendants are willing to withdraw the second affirmative defense (official policy or custom), and the parties are in the process of meeting and
Seals v. Mitchell, et al. C-04-3764 NJV Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for filing of Amended Answer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SA N F R A N C I S C O

conferring with respect to the sufficiency of the first affirmative defense (qualified immunity). In order to give the parties sufficient time to meet and confer with respect to the remaining affirmative defense, and in order to give Defendants sufficient time to amend the Answer, the parties hereby stipulate that Defendants will file a Second Amended Answer on or before September 6, 2010. The parties also stipulate that Plaintiff will have until twenty-one (21) days after service of the Amended Answer to file any motion to strike.

Dated: August 20, 2010

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Al Pfeiffer Ashley Bauer Meghna Subramanian

By

/s Meghna Subramanian Meghna Subramanian Attorney for Plaintiff Michael Izell Seals

Dated: August 20, 2010

JONES & DYER Mark A. Jones Kristen K. Preston

By

/s Kristen K. Preston Kristen K. Preston Attorney for Defendants John Rynhart Lyle Thomas

2

Seals v. Mitchell, et al. C-04-3764 NJV Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for filing of Amended Answer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SA N F R A N C I S C O

ORDER

The Court having considered the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court herby orders that Defendants John Rynhart and Lyle Thomas will file an Amended Answer on or before September 6, 2010. ^ September 7, 2010. Plaintiff will have until 21 days after service of the Amended Answer by which to file any motion to strike. IT IS SO ORDERED.

8/20/2010 Dated: _____________

/s/ Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas HON. NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

3

Seals v. Mitchell, et al. C-04-3764 NJV Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for filing of Amended Answer