Moore v. Thomas, et al.

Filing 156

STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/12/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Megan Dixon (State Bar No. 162895) Mark V. Hoogland (State Bar No. 244559) Nimrod Haim Aviad (State Bar No. 259705) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 4 Embarcadero Center, 22nd floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 374-2300 Facsimile: (415) 374-2499 Attorneys for Plaintiff JUMAH ALI-THOMAS MOORE [Additional Counsel Appear On Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Jumah Ali-Thomas Moore, Plaintiff, Case No. C-06-2105 (SBA) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE VADAS Trial Date: Judge: September 20, 2010 The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong Action Filed: October 24, 2005 vs. M. Arroyo, L. Baez, C. Matthews, C. Tsai, C. Vogel-Pace, and L. Zamora, Defendants. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE VADAS CASE NO.: C 06-2105-SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS the parties to this litigation, Plaintiff Jumah Ali-Thomas Moore ("Mr. Moore") and Defendants M. Arroyo, L. Baez, C. Matthews, C. Tsai, C. Vogel-Pace, and L. Zamora (collectively, the "Parties") have negotiated a resolution in principle before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas; WHEREAS the Parties have reached an agreement on the terms of a mutually agreeable resolution of this case; WHEREAS the Parties require additional time to resolve the calculation of Mr. Moore's restitution fines and the total amount owed; WHEREAS the deadline for non-expert discovery is May 24, 2010; WHEREAS, given the resolution, the Parties have agreed to stay all discovery pending clarification of the restitution amount; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE VADAS 1 CASE NO.: C 06-2105-SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff and Defendants, through their respective counsel of record, as follows: The Parties consent to proceed before the Honorable Nandor Vadas for all proceedings including jury trial, if necessary. IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. DATED: May 11, 2010 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP By: /s/ Mark V. Hoogland Mark V. Hoogland Attorneys for Plaintiff JUMAH ALI-THOMAS MOORE DATED: May 11, 2010 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California THOMAS S. PATTERSON Supervising Deputy Attorney General By: /s/ Trace Maiorino TRACE MAIORINO Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Zamora, Baez, Tsai, Arroyo, Matthews, and Vogel-Pace I, Mark Vrooman Hoogland, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE VADAS. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that I have on file the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE VADAS CASE NO.: C 06-2105-SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE VADAS ORDER Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Case No. C 06-2105 (SBA) is assigned to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas for all proceedings including jury trial, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 12, 2010 ___________________________________________ THE HONORABLE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG CASE NO.: C 06-2105-SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?