Wood et al v. Scottsdale Indemnity Company

Filing 83

ORDER re 82 Stipulation filed by Scottsdale Indemnity Company. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 9/14/09. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

LINDA WENDELL HSU (SBN 162971) SELMAN BREITMAN LLP 33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorney for Defendant Scottsdale Indemnity Company UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Selman Breitman LLP

11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

CLARENCE JONATHON WOOD and HEIDI COLLINGWOOD, Plaintiffs, v. SCOTTSDALE INDEMNITY CO.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants.

CASE NO.

CV 08 3335 NJV

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT LIMITED ADDITIONAL BRIEFING IN THE PARTIES' CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [L.R. 7-11 and 7-12]

Pursuant to the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel of record, that: 1. Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in

support of their Motion for Summary Judgment exceeded the page limitations established by local rule by five (5) pages (30 pages instead of 25). 2. To address and oppose the arguments in the 5 extra 1

177876.1 380.25532

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT LIMITED ADDITIONAL BRIEFING IN THE PARTIES' CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - CV 08 3335 NJV

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

pages of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, pp. 26 to 30, Scottsdale Indemnity Company ("Scottsdale") may file up to an extra 5 briefing pages in a Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment as a separate brief. Such supplemental brief will be

filed by September 22, 2009 and the arguments contained, therein, will be limited to a response to the arguments stated on pages 26 to 30 of plaintiff's points and authorities. 3. Plaintiffs may file a two page Memorandum of Points and

Authorities in Reply to the Supplemental Opposition filed by defendant. Such Reply shall be filed by September 25, 2009 and

Selman Breitman LLP

11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

be limited to a response to the arguments contained in defendant's Supplemental Opposition. IT IS SO STIPULATED: DATED: September 9, 2009 SELMAN BREITMAN LLP

By: /s/ Linda Wendell Hsu LINDA WENDELL HSU Attorneys for Defendant SCOTTSDALE INDEMNITY COMPANY

DATED: September 9, 2009

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID P. DIBBLE

By: /s/ David P. Dibble DAVID P. DIBBLE Attorney for Plaintiff CLARENCE JONATHON WOOD

177876.1 380.25532

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT LIMITED ADDITIONAL BRIEFING IN THE PARTIES' CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - CV 08 3335 NJV

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

DATED: September 9, 2009

LAW OFFICE OF ZACHARY E. ZWERDLING

By: /s/ Zachary E. Zwerdling ZACHARY E. ZWERDLING Attorney for Plaintiff HEIDI COLLINGWOOD

IT IS SO ORDERED: DATED: September 14 , 2009 By:

NANDOR J. VADASUnited States Magistrate Judge JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT

Selman Breitman LLP

11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

177876.1 380.25532

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT LIMITED ADDITIONAL BRIEFING IN THE PARTIES' CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - CV 08 3335 NJV