Wood et al v. Scottsdale Indemnity Company
Filing
99
ORDER Denying as Moot Scottsdale Indemnity Company's Motion to File Statement of Recent Decision. Signed by Judge Vadas on 2/11/10. (cmw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER This matter is before the Court on Scottsdale Indemnity Company's Motion To File Statement of Recent Decision ("Motion"). The Court, having already considered the Second District Court of Appeals' January 21, 2010 opinion Superior Dispatch Inc. v. Insurance Corp. of New York, 2010 WL 187957 in its ruling on the v. SCOTTSDALE INDEMNITY CO.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION CLARENCE JONATHON WOOD and HEIDI COLLINGWOOD, Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 08-CV-3335 NJV
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, finds the Motion to be moot. The Motion is therefore denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED. 1
ORDER DENYING SCOTTSDALE'S MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION CASE NO. 08-CV-3335 NJV
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATED: February 11, 2010 By:
NANDOR J. VADAS U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ORDER DENYING SCOTTSDALE'S MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION CASE NO. 08-CV-3335 NJV
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
