Yordy v. Astrue

Filing 24

ORDER re 23 Stipulation filed by Mikel James Yordy. Plaintiff may have until September 7, 2010 by which to file a motion for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 8/20/2010. (hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 KENNETH J. COLLINS CSB 100579 Attorney at Law P.O. Box 1193 Arcata, CA 95518 (707)822-1611 fax 822-1044 aew1950@yahoo.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff Mikel James Yordy may have an extension until September 5, 2010, in which to file plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. This stipulation is entered into in order to provide sufficient time for Plaintiff to submit arguments and new evidence to the Defendant to allow the Defendant to ascertain the validity and importance of the evidence. Two previous extensions have been requested and granted in this case. Mikel James Yordy, Plaintiff, vs. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant Case No.: 1-09-cv-03028-NJV ORDER ON STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Stipulation In Support Of Plaintiff's Third Request For Extension Of Time -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: August 19, 2010 /s/ Kenneth J. Collins KENNETH J. COLLINS Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Daniel P. Talbert As authorized by email 8/19/10 DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Dated: August 19, 2010 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff may have until September 7, 2010 by which to file a motion for summary judgment. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8/20/2010 /s/ Magistrate Judge Vadas Hon. Nandor J. Vadas United States Magistrate Judge Stipulation In Support Of Plaintiff's Third Request For Extension Of Time -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?