Remington v. Mathson et al
Filing
107
ORDER re 95 Bill of Costs filed by John Mathson, Joy Mathson. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2012)
1
NOT FOR CITATION
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
EUREKA DIVISION
6
7
8
No.09-CV 09-4547 NJV
BRUCE REMINGTON,
10
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
12
13
ORDER RE COSTS
v.
JOHN MATHSON, JOY MATHSON,
Defendants.
/
14
15
The Court entered judgment for Defendants on April 3, 2012. Pending before the Court is
16
Defendants' Bill of Costs, filed April 17, 2012. (Docket No. 95.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition to
17
the Bill of Costs. (Docket No. 96.)
18
The only costs sought by Defendants are those for depositions conducted March 14, 2011,
19
and March 17, 2011. Deposition costs are specifically allowed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1920(2) and Rule
20
54(d)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections to the Bill
21
of Costs and finds them meritless. The Court notes in particular that Defendants' Bill of Costs filed
22
April 17, 2012, was filed fourteen days after the entry of Judgment and was therefore timely. See
23
Civil Local Rule 54-1(a); Rule 6(a)(1)(A), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (day of the event which
24
triggers the period is excluded when computing time).
25
Defendants request costs for the reporter's attendance at the depositions on March 14, 2011,
26
and March 17, 2011. However, costs for reporter attendance are allowable only if the witness fails to
27
appear. Civil Local Rule 54-3(c). It is undisputed that Plaintiff appeared at the deposition on March
28
17, 2011. Accordingly, costs for the reporter attendance at that deposition will not be allowed.
1
Accordingly, Defendants are HEREBY AWARDED costs in the amount of $835.10. This
2
award of costs is STAYED pending the outcome of an appeal in this action, or the running of the
3
time for filing a notice of appeal, whichever comes first.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
DATED: June 7, 2012
_______________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?