Remington v. Mathson et al
ORDER re: noncompliance with the reporting requirement contained in the Court's March 26, 2010 order. Signed by Judge Vadas on August 13, 2010. (cmw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 13, 2010 NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge BRUCE REMINGTON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MATHSON, JOY MATHSON, et al., Defendants. / No. CV 09-4547 NJV ORDER RE: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURT'S MARCH 26, 2010 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION NOT FOR CITATION
In its March 26, 2010 order denying in part and granting in part Defendants' motion to dismiss or alternatively stay (Doc. No. 36), the Court directed the parties to provide periodic updates to the Court, at least every 60 days, regarding the progress of the state court action and whether resolution has been reached on the quiet title, trespass, nuisance, nuisance per se, negligence, and/or negligence per se claims in the state court action. To date, no such report has been received. The Court hereby orders the parties to provide the aforementioned status report no later than Friday, August 20, 2010 and every 60 days thereafter. The parties are advised that further failure to abide by the Court's orders may be grounds for sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?