Remington v. Mathson et al

Filing 71

ORDER VACATING 9/27/11 motion date. Matter will be decided on the papers. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 9/19/11. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011)

Download PDF
1 NOT FOR CITATION 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EUREKA DIVISION 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Case No. 1: CV 09-4547 NJV 11 12 13 14 ORDER VACATING ORAL ARGUMENT BRUCE REMINGTON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MATHSON, JOY MATHSON, et al., Defendants. 15 / 16 Defendants' motion for protective order and exclusion sanctions is set for hearing on 17 September 27, 2011. The Court has determined that the matter has been adequately briefed by the 18 parties and that oral argument is unnecessary. Accordingly, the motion shall stand submitted as of 19 September 27, 2011, and will be decided on the papers. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 19, 2011 NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 Remington No. C 09-4547 NJV 7 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 8 Mathson __________________________/ 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 11 12 13 That on September 19, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail; or by placing said copy into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Office of the Clerk. 14 15 16 Bruce Remington 5149 Blackberry Lane Eureka, CA 95503 17 18 RICHARD W. WIEKING, CLERK 19 By:/s/ Gloria Masterson Deputy Clerk 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?