Remington v. Mathson et al
Filing
71
ORDER VACATING 9/27/11 motion date. Matter will be decided on the papers. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 9/19/11. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011)
1
NOT FOR CITATION
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
EUREKA DIVISION
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Case No. 1: CV 09-4547 NJV
11
12
13
14
ORDER VACATING ORAL ARGUMENT
BRUCE REMINGTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN MATHSON, JOY MATHSON, et al.,
Defendants.
15
/
16
Defendants' motion for protective order and exclusion sanctions is set for hearing on
17
September 27, 2011. The Court has determined that the matter has been adequately briefed by the
18
parties and that oral argument is unnecessary. Accordingly, the motion shall stand submitted as of
19
September 27, 2011, and will be decided on the papers.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: September 19, 2011
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
Remington
No. C 09-4547 NJV
7
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
8
Mathson
__________________________/
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
11
12
13
That on September 19, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing
said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail; or by placing said copy into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Office of the Clerk.
14
15
16
Bruce Remington
5149 Blackberry Lane
Eureka, CA 95503
17
18
RICHARD W. WIEKING, CLERK
19
By:/s/
Gloria Masterson
Deputy Clerk
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?