Sharma et al v. Provident Funding Associates, L.P. et al
Filing
79
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on February 4, 2013. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)
Case1:09-cv-05968-NJV Document78 Filed01/28/13 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Stephen C. Ruehmann, Esq. (167533)
steve@ruehmannlawfirm.com
Robin D. Shofner, Esq. (272552)
robin@ruehmannlawfirm.com
RUEHMANN LAW FIRM, P.C.
9580 Oak Avenue Parkway, Suite 15
Folsom, California 95630
Tel: (916) 988-8001
Fax: (916) 988-8002
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
ANILECH SHARMA and
PARMA SHARMA
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ANILECH SHARMA AND PARMA
SHARMA,
) Case No.: CV09-05968
)
) REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
Plaintiffs,
) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
vs.
)
)
PROVIDENT FUNDING ASSOCIATES, )
L.P., a California limited partnership;
)
PREFERRED MORTGAGE;
)
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
)
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a
)
Delaware corporation; MAX DEFAULT )
SERVICES CORPORATION, a California )
corporation and DOES 1-100, inclusive, )
)
Defendants.
)
)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to FRCP 41(a), Plaintiffs ANILECH
23
SHARMA AND PARMA SHARMA, voluntarily dismiss the above-captioned action with
24
prejudice.
25
Dated: January 28, 2013
REUHMANN LAW FIRM, P.C.
26
27
28
__/s/ Robin D. Shofner______________
Robin D. Shofner
Attorney for Plaintiffs ANILECH
SHARMA AND PARMA SHARMA
1
REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case1:09-cv-05968-NJV Document78 Filed01/28/13 Page2 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL
DISTR
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
6
RT
8
D
RDERE
S SO O
IT IUnited States District Magistrate Judge
andor
Judge N
NO
7
__________________________________
ER
10
J. Vadas
A
H
9
R NIA
5
Dated:
UNIT
ED
4
ICT
C
RT
U
O
3
ES
AT
T
FO
2
LI
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?